1.
A funny situation e.g.
good situation comedy
2.
A joke or other funny
words, spoken, sung or read
3.
A funny sight or
sensation e.g. being tickled
4.
The lowest form of
wit. Sarcasm; feeling somebody is funny
because you feel superior to them. This is extremely ‘common’, and getting more
common by the week on TV.
There is then a whole ‘Octave of Delight’
multiplied by a half Octave of Humour – 4 basic Octaves. However – and it is a big but – there are to
me at least, an unknowable number of Octaves of ‘what individuals find funny in
a given piece of humour’ to multiply this up by – to a comparable number of
Octaves to inter-personal Love as above, probably? I for one, as I just said, would not like to
destroy the mystique of the phrase ‘sense of humour’ by trying to enumerate
them here!
6.
BEAUTY with a masculine biased aspect of elegance and a feminine biased
aspect of colour
Elegance, as you will have come to expect
from all the discussion up to this point, yet again comes in an Octave or
Spectrum. As before, there is a Half
Octave of positively elegant qualities, and a second half octave made of their
negative opposites. As an exercise, I
leave you to fill in the latter below, while I only give the positive elements
of Elegance in the list that follows: -
1.
Form, shape and/or
proportion of parts and/or movement
2.
Pattern, texture,
and/or material
3.
Mood or spirit of
shape and/or movement
4.
Ergonomic suitability
for purpose/place/movement
5.
6.
7.
8.
I will not dwell on the above except to
say that it is in the realm of hundreds of thousands of books and works of art
utilising many elaborate, sophisticated artistic and aesthetic theories!
We turn immediately to Colour, where yet again as we see an
Octave very definitely applies to this ‘language of light and form’.
First of all, we need to clear up common
misunderstandings about the differences between the so-called ‘primary colours’
of light which are the three of red, green and blue (RGB) and the corresponding
‘primary colours of paint or surfaces’ i.e. reflected
light which are very different ‘subtraction’ primary colours. These are cyan, magenta, and yellow (CMY).
Primary colours are the colours we mix to produce all the other colours.
Because there are different ways to do the mixing, we need different sets of
primary colours.
The primary colours of light are needed when we are mixing different
coloured light together. This is done in a computer monitor (whether using LCD
technology, or the older CRT technology). The computer screen can emit only
three colours, and every colour we see on the screen is produced from a mixture
of those three primary colours.
The human eye contains four kinds of receptors. There are the “rods”,
which detect brightness but not colour. There are also three kinds of “cones”,
which are sensitive to red (lower frequency), green (medium frequency) and blue
(higher frequency) light. All other colours trigger two or more kinds of cones.
For example, orange and yellow trigger the red and green cones (in different
proportions), while magenta triggers the red and blue cones.
A computer monitor comprises pixels (”dots”) of different colours. By
using the same three colours as the receptors in our eyes, the monitor can
produce any colour.
Actually, there is a small range of colours that can’t quite be produced
by a computer monitor, mostly because the cones in our eyes don’t have a
perfect response at a single frequency, and there’s even a tiny amount of
overlap between them. So the computer monitor doesn’t trigger an identical
response in our brain, and the colours on the monitor don’t look quite perfect.
Nevertheless, using the primary colours of light – red, green and blue – works
well enough for most purposes. The abbreviation RGB is often used to refer to
red, green and blue.
You might also see the primary colours of light being mixed in live
theatre or on the dance floor, where different coloured spotlights have their
beams mixed on the stage or floor.
Painting, on the other hand, works subtractively, in contrast to the
computer monitor which starts black and has coloured light added to it (the
additive process). An artist’s canvas starts off being white (which means it
reflects all colours of the light which lands on it). The artist adds paints
which block the reflection of certain colours.
If the artist uses yellow paint it blocks the blue light, leaving just
the red and green components (which our eye sees as yellow). If the artist uses
cyan paint (a “greenish-blue”) it blocks the red light, leaving just the green
and blue components (which our eye sees as cyan). If the artist uses magenta
paint (a “pinkish-purple”) it blocks the green light, leaving just the red and
blue components (which our eyes see as magenta).
The artist can mix the paints. Using yellow and cyan paints blocks the
blue and red, leaving just the green component. So our eye sees that yellow and
cyan paints mixed together look green.
Traditionally for painting we refer to the primary colours as red,
yellow and blue. These are near enough for many purposes, because the artist
can tweak the mix to get the desired colour. Red and blue are close enough to
magenta and cyan that we can consider red, yellow and blue to be the primary
colours of paint. It’s just that they can’t reproduce quite such a wide range
of colours as magenta, yellow and cyan. The abbreviation CMY is often used for
cyan, magenta and yellow.
Printing onto paper is also a subtractive process. Here we won’t be able
to tweak the results “by eye”, so we usually need to use inks that are truly
magenta, yellow and cyan.
Any artist will know that when you mix the three primary colours
together you don’t usually get a pure black, instead you get a murky dark brown
or deep purple. It’s just not practical to get the perfect pigments and to mix
them together in the perfect ratios. To get the best result, the printer will
add a fourth colour of ink – black – to ensure that deep blacks really do look
black rather than brownish or purplish.
The abbreviation CMYK is often used to refer to the printing “process
colours” of Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and blacK.
So there you have it. The primary colours of light are red, green and
blue. The primary colours of paint are magenta, yellow and cyan (or
conventionally red, yellow and blue). The primary colours of printing are
magenta, yellow and cyan augmented by black.
The Octave or Spectrum of Primary Colours
So finally, the Octave of Colour – the
‘language of light and form’ – is as follows: -
1. Red (first primary colour of light)
2. Green (second “ “ “
“ )
3. Blue (third “ “
“ “ )
4. White (sum of 1-3 in light – used in paint as “4th primary
colour” to produce light hues)
5. Cyan (first primary colour of paint – absorbs red light)
6. Magenta (second primary colour of paint – absorbs green light)
7. Yellow (third primary colour of paint – absorbs blue light)
8. Black (sum of 5-7 in paint – used in light as “4th primary
colour” to produce dark hues – TV, computer and mobile screens are all black
for this reason).
We
are not alone! Other creatures see different
primary colours to the above purely HUMAN primary colours
·
Other living creatures
than humans have entirely different vision systems to us, so the above does not
apply!
·
Dogs see only in black
and white, my daughter, a trainee zoologist, told me
·
She also told me that
bulls see just black and white – and red – an alarm colour to them. This explains how matadors in Spanish
bullfights are able to distract a furious charging bull with their red capes!
·
Birds have more
sophisticated vision than us, with four not just three types of frequency
colour cones in their eyes. Hence they
see four primary colours of light and four of surfaces – totally different to
us! If they were to use computers, to
get the full set of colours they would need four primary colours in the screen
and four different primary colours in the printer!
7.
HEALTH – yet another vast area yet with an Octave of ‘Spiritual
Qualities required for Perfect Health’
This is obviously the area of that vast
discipline of medicine, along with homeopathy, alternative medicine, spiritual
healing, herbal remedies and household remedies. Again vast text books already exist on the
subject – so I confine myself to just the basic Octave I can detect of the four
basic spiritual elements or qualities required for the absolute ideal –
somebody to be in perfect health! Once again, as for ‘Elegance’ as at the start
of the last section, I leave you to fill in the four negative qualities as an
exercise: -
1.
Perfectly sound mind,
spirit and soul
2.
Total freedom from disease
or infections or any pain
3.
Whole and sound of all
limbs, organs and skin (which is our largest organ)
4.
Clean, disease- and
germ- free environment including: - adequate wholesome diet and water, adequate
clean air of a suitable temperature, adequate sanitation and living conditions
5.
6.
7.
8.
8.
PEACE is the first ‘social level’ concept we have to deal with – and the
subject of much politicking with the object of peaceful societies and
co-existence between different nations rather than war.
Again we are venturing into a vast area of
the world of politics and its most fundamental aims worldwide – one of the main
such aims in most countries globally being World Peace. Again, to simplify, I will be comparing any
society that has achieved a blissful peaceful state to a ‘state of stable
equilibrium’ from my original home subject of physics. Yet again we can see that there is a Half
Octave of ‘principal spiritual Qualities of Peace’ and as before I leave you to
complete the Octave with their opposite concepts: -
1.
The system i.e.
society is ‘at rest’ (in peace) in ‘stable equilibrium’
2.
There is no lower
energy state for the society/system i.e. there is no more peaceful state nearby
– the ‘peace is at a maximum’
3.
All forces on that
society/system are equally balanced by an opposing force or forces
4.
There is no threat to
the ‘peace’ / stable equilibrium from nearby unbalanced so ‘hostile’ forces
5.
6.
7.
8.
On this subject I leave you with a slogan
used by many a peace-keeping soldier: –
“It is a lot easier to win the peace than
keep the peace afterwards”.
9.
The Spiritual Octave of the GRACE of (God The Holy) Spirit. A mere concluding mention of Messiahs and
their New Jerusalems as at the very top of my diagram at the start of this
Article Seven. I don’t wish to offend
anyone!
Grace is a religious subject, so to avoid
treading on anybody’s sensitivities I again keep the discussion brief. This second purely social quality after
peace, in the Tree of Life of the Holy Spirit, as for all the other Spiritual
Qualities we have looked at in this Article, yet again comes in a Half Octave
and again I leave you to supply the negative opposites below: -
1.
Turning the other
cheek
2.
Denouncing all
violence
3.
Respecting if not
loving neighbours – and above all God
4.
Staying 100% inside
all relevant local laws
5.
6.
7.
8.
So, at length we have come to the end of
an extensive enumeration and cataloguing of a myriad Spiritual Qualities of
(God The Holy) Spirit in this Article Seven.
I do not by any stretch of the imagination intend to try to assign such
‘Octaves’ to the two ‘spirits’ at the top of the diagram of the Tree of Life –
the ‘Messianic Urge’ and their ‘New Jerusalem’.
For one thing that does not work – they are “God on Earth” to most
people so embody everything that has gone before! Secondly, the three main religions of the
West have very disparate views on the subject.
If you are Jewish, you are taught to
expect a ‘Messiah of the Jews’ at ‘The Time of the End’. Christians maintain this Messiah has already
been once, he was called Jesus (Jehoshuah in his native Aramaic) – and most
Christians believe he will return from Heaven for good one day. Muslims believe there will be the coming
instead of a (last) Prophet before the ‘Day of Judgement’. Clearly there is a lot of room to trample on
people’s religious sensitivities here, so I leave this final section about
‘Octaves of (God The Holy) Spirit’ while ignoring any discussion of which of
these three religions, or the many Far Eastern religions which have no such ‘Future
Messianic Teaching’; is ‘right’ - if that is at all possible, or relevant.
Science and its
abhorrent neglect of The Mind, Spiritual Values and Energies – and
Language. How one way Science, The Arts
and Religion can all be individually ‘right’ is my claim that the Spiritual
Energies as above occupy Seven or Eight Hidden Dimensions – as already
postulated by scientists! The Large
Hadron Collider.
We have just examined in great detail, a
vast panoply of ‘things of the soul, spirit and mind’. Yet my extensive knowledge of science tells
me that very few scientists ever even seem to believe or even acknowledge that
these vital elements of our being even exist.
Let alone incorporate them in their theories. Physics, chemistry and biology, the main sciences,
all ignore the mind of humans and other animals. The mind does not appear in a single
scientific equation that I am aware of!
Instead the world is seen, even today, as an ‘abstract giant piece of
clockwork’. Even psychiatry and
neuroscience are two relatively infant ‘sciences’ that, although because they
are about the mind you might think they would incorporate it, totally reduce
all their theorising to ‘chemical reactions in the brain and other chemical
reactions or surgery to contain malignant ones’! They again totally ignore the mind!
Yet I will make the following set of
points about this book: -
·
Scientists and
engineers, ignore language and the mind at your peril. Does not the word ‘love’ contain a massive
energy or impact for you? As we saw earlier
in this book – spiritual energy or language energy comprises, in my view, most
of the Energy in the Universe – 91.666…%! i.e. constitutes all that you call
‘dark matter’!
·
As I write, just next
month the Large Hadron Collider should resume its work at CERN, Geneva. If it fully vindicates the theory that there
are eight hidden dimensions of space – the ideas in this book will become very
popular.
·
Computers only work in
four dimensions, so only act as ‘thought or information recorders’. The current design
will never become conscious as thought and spirit operate in all of twelve dimensions, not just four!
·
Likewise a scientific
‘theory of everything’ will only come about when it includes ‘everything’ –
including the mind!
More ‘conventional’ approaches to
Scientific Proof that God Exists: ‘irreducible complexity’, the ‘Anthropic
Principle’ and ‘Intelligent Design’
How
incredibly precisely and universally that the Sevenfold Holy Spirit, as
discussed up to now, continuously imposes, through the laws of physics that
They Control at all times, the finest
balances in matter, cells, life, stars and planets, and the whole Universe
itself.
The
evidence in this appendix is taken from the web site www.godsciencemanifesto.com by
kind copyright permission of the owners of that web site.
Darwin's
theory of evolution claims that the first living cell was accidentally created from
just the right, random combination of ingredients over millions of years, but
modern scientists from microbiologists to chemists are beginning to realize
that the odds against this theory are so astronomical that it's impossible.
Because of these calculations even a growing number of evolutionists are being
forced to admit that because the simplest living cell is so incredibly
complicated, the time it would take to be formed through purely random forces
of nature would take billions and billions of years longer than the age of the
entire universe!
But
the origins of life aren't the only mysterious phenomena in the universe. In
1973, an astrophysicist and cosmologist by the name of Brandon Carter developed
a theory called the Anthropic Principle, which states that the physical
constants in the universe have been formed in the only way possible for the
creation of life. Another scientist,
Patrick Glynn, puts it this way:
"...the
Anthropic Principle says that the seemingly arbitrary and unrelated constants
in physics have one strange thing in common—these are precisely the values you
need if you want to have a universe capable of producing life."
From
many other recent scientific discoveries about the Universe, this evidence can
be defined as a progression of phenomena, each one of which is a building block
for the creation of life.
PHENOMENON 1: CREATION OF THE
UNIVERSE
Scientists'
Big Bang theory states that the universe was created about fifteen to twenty
billion years ago from a giant explosion. Regardless of whether this theory is
correct, the fact remains that the universe itself contains many physical
relationships that have remained constant.
Only
recently, however, are scientists beginning to discover the strange coincidence
that all these physical constants are exactly what they have to be in order for
all life to exist. In other words, the slightest deviation in any of these
constants would prevent the existence of life anywhere in the universe.
Here
are only some of these very bizarre coincidences, which have recently been
discussed by many scientists:
1. Particle mass ratios. Ail the electrons and
protons in the universe have an exact mass ratio—a proton is 1836 times more
massive than an electron. If this ratio were slightly bigger or smaller,
molecules could not form and life would be impossible.
2. Constant mass. If the total mass of the
universe were slightly larger, too much deuterium would cause ail stars to burn
so fast that life wouldn't develop, and if this total mass were less, no helium
would exist and stars couldn't produce the elements necessary for life.
3. Star distance. If the distance between stars
in the universe were slightly less, the gravitational pull of stars would be so
great that planetary orbits would be upset, creating extreme temperature
changes that would destroy life. If this distance were greater than it is, the
heavy fragments thrown out by exploding stars would be so thinly dispersed that
no planets could ever be formed.
4.
Key elements. The three elements
beryllium, carbon and oxygen have exact energy levels in their atomic
nucleuses. Beryllium is so unstable that it slows down the fusion rate of
stars. If it were just a bit more stable, these stars would explode and many of
the elements necessary for life wouldn't be formed. If beryllium were even more
unstable than it is now, star fusion would be slowed down to the point where
element production beyond beryllium wouldn't occur at all.
5. Carbon. The energy level of the element
carbon's nucleus has an exact relationship to both helium and beryllium. If
this ratio changed even slightly up or down, there wouldn't be enough carbon in
the universe for life to exist.
6. Oxygen has exactly the right energy level in
its nucleus to allow it to be produced from carbon in just the amount necessary
for the existence of life on earth. If this energy level were greater or
smaller, all carbon would be prevented from turning into oxygen, and life would
not be possible.
These
last three coincidences were so startling to scientist Fred Hoyle that he made
this comment: "A superintellect has monkeyed with physics—as well as with
chemistry and biology."
Remember,
these are only some of the examples in this group; there are many more.
PHENOMENON 2 - UNSEEN FORCES
The
Universe is a single, endless field of energy: the "deep space" that
stretches from the inner space of atoms which make up all matter, to the outer
space at the edge of the universe. In addition to making up all the visible
physical reality in the universe, the Universe is also made up of four basic
invisible forces: 1) The strong force that holds together subatomic particles;
2) the weak force that's involved in radioactive decay; 3) gravity, and 4)
electromagnetic radiation, which includes a wide range of wave energies from
mile-long radio waves at one end, to light in the middle, and to very short
x-rays at the other end.
There
are also some extremely odd coincidences about the exact nature of these four
forces. Here are some of them.
1. Gravity. The force of gravity is constant
throughout the universe. If it were just a bit stronger, stars would be larger
and burn too fast, which means that none of them could support life on
surrounding planets. If gravity were slightly weaker, all stars would have less
mass, and the elements necessary for the formation of planets wouldn't be
created, also making life impossible.
2. The strong nuclear force holds together small
particles in the nucleus of all atoms. If this force were slightly weaker,
these nucleuses wouldn't hold together and hydrogen would be the only element
in the universe. If stronger, hydrogen would be rare in the universe, and so
would most of the elements necessary for life.
3. The weak nuclear force is necessary for radioactive
decay, and if it were slightly less, helium would be rare in the universe—along
with other elements necessary for life. If this weak force were stronger, the
elements necessary for life would be trapped forever inside the cores of stars.
4. The electromagnetic force binds electrons to
protons in all atoms. If this force were slightly larger or smaller, molecules
couldn't form and life would be impossible.
PHENOMENON 3: THE EARTH
The
earth was created as a result of all the strangely precise physical constants
outlined in Phenomena 1 and 2—and the earth itself is also very odd in many
ways. For example, all the planets in our solar system are either burnt-out
rocks or fiery satellites circling the sun with very little if any life. Earth
is the only planet that has an atmosphere that supports millions of species.
But if any one of several dozen of earth's physical constants were even
slightly changed, life would vanish forever—and how our atmosphere remains
exactly the way it is to support all this life has been a mystery for years.
1.
Water. Unlike all other planets, which have surfaces that are either barren
deserts or seething with toxic oceans, almost three-quarters of our earth is
bathed in water, and if it weren't for the very unusual characteristics of this
simple but amazing combination of two molecules of hydrogen and one of oxygen,
there would be no life on our planet at all.
Ordinary
water is anything but ordinary. In fact, it's remarkably different from all
other liquids. For example, water is denser as a liquid than as a solid. If
this weren't the case, ice freezing in a lake would sink to the bottom, killing
all marine life. Water also has an amazing ability to store heat—without it the
body temperature of the average person would soar to almost 300 degrees
Fahrenheit during the day. Water can act as both an acid and as a base, and its
incredibly flexible nature makes it ideally suited for the many chemical
changes required for ail living organisms—not to mention the fact that living
organisms themselves are made up of a large part of water. In humans, the
figure is 65%.
The
anomalous qualities of water compared to other liquids are amazing enough—but
how all these qualities combine in exactly the right way to support all life on
earth is even more amazing. Needless to say, scientists really have no exact
idea how this remarkable and mysterious liquid works.
2. The electromagnetic force that fills the
Universe is made of a number of waves that are fatal to all life: gamma rays,
x-rays, ultraviolet waves, infrared waves and microwaves. However, by the
strangest of coincidences, the gases that make up earth's atmosphere soak up
every one of these deadly rays like a sponge—but at the same time this same
atmosphere keeps one extremely small window open to let through the one
electromagnetic wave that's necessary for all life—sunlight. The size of this
window is the distance between deadly ultraviolet rays at .0004 of an inch, and
equally deadly infrared rays at .00004 of an inch—this means that our
atmosphere opens a window only 36/100,000 of an inch wide to let through this
vital sunlight—and blocks out every other ray that would destroy life.
3. The carbon dioxide and water vapour levels in
our atmosphere have exactly the right balance for supporting life—if there were
slightly more carbon dioxide, a disastrous greenhouse effect would exist, and
if less carbon dioxide, there wouldn't be enough greenhouse effect and the
earth would cool dramatically.
4. If the ozone layer were slightly thinner, too
many deadly ultraviolet rays would reach earth and ground temperatures would
also rise — if the ozone layer were slightly thicker, surface temperatures
would drop drastically. Either way, life on earth would be destroyed.
5. The moon is very important because it
stabilizes the earth as it spins around the sun--if the gravitational pull
between these two bodies were slightly greater, disastrous tidal effects would
be created in the oceans and atmosphere, and if this gravitational pull were
less, earth's orbit would change and there would be catastrophic changes in
climate.
6. The angle that the earth tilts at as it
revolves around the sun is exactly what's necessary to sustain life as it is—a
greater or lesser tilt in any direction would produce severe temperature
changes all over the earth.
7. Atmosphere. The only other planets in our
solar system that resemble earth enough to support life are Venus and Mars. But
both these planets have atmospheres that are 95% carbon dioxide and their
surfaces are barren rock. On the other hand, the earth's atmosphere has a ratio
of 77% nitrogen to 21% oxygen, which, again, is exactly what's needed to
support life. Any slight change in this ratio would have disastrous effects on
all life.
PHENOMENON 4: LIFE
All
of the above Phenomena #l-#3 are necessary for the existence of Phenomenon #4,
life. Evolutionists claim that the first living cell was created randomly from
the primordial soup of ancient seas, and that over millions of years complete
organisms, including man, also evolved from this single living cell—also by
sheer accident. Today scientists are beginning to realize that life itself is
such an amazing phenomenon that this theory is impossible, and here's some of
the evidence supporting this conclusion.
1.
The first living cell. The simplest living cell has 400 linked amino acids. But
even if this ceil had only 100 amino acids, the probability that it would form
by complete chance is about one in 10 followed by 158 zeros. To get an idea
what a long shot this is, the total number of electrons in the universe is only
10 followed by 80 zeros, and the age of the universe in seconds is 10 followed
by only 18 zeros! Dr. Hugh Ross thinks that even these astronomical odds are
too low:
"Researchers
who are both non-theists and theists and who are in a variety of disciplines
have arrived at the calculation that the universe is at least 10 followed by 10
billion zeros too small or too young for life to be assembled by natural
(random) processes."
And
Dr. Harold Klein had this to say: "The simplest bacterium is so damned
complicated from the point of view of a chemist that it's almost impossible to
imagine how it happened."
Anyone
who's played a Pick 10 lottery knows how difficult it is to randomly guess even
ten numbers in an exact sequence—but here's how long another scientist, B.C.
Ranganathan, tells us it would take for Mother Nature to win the Pick-3,000,000
lottery:
"The
DNA of even the simplest form of life, such as a bacterium, has a sequential
chain of 3,000,000 nucleic acids. The probability of this occurring by chance
is equivalent to that of an unabridged dictionary coming into being from a
monkey randomly pressing the keys on a typewriter or computer. Even the one
billion years that evolutionists give for the first form of life to have come
into being by chance is laughable in the light of such knowledge."
2.
The first artificially produced living cell.
Since Darwinists believe that the first living cell was created by a
purely random combination of just the right natural ingredients over a billion
years, scientists should certainly be able to come close to duplicating this
process by artificially creating living cells in a laboratory. Even though
these experiments would be anything but random, despite many attempts over the
years, not a single such experiment has ever succeeded.
The
irony of this failure is exactly the same as the absence of transitional
fossils—it's completely backfired against the theory of evolution to give us an
even stronger case for a Supreme Being.
3. No transitional fossils. Not one, but
millions of transitional fossils should have been found since Darwin's time. In fact, he was the first to
admit that if no such fossils were ever found, his theory of evolution would be
invalid. But instead of admitting defeat after more than a hundred years and
thousands of new fossil sites, Darwinists today keep on preaching their faith
with nothing but empty rhetoric and contrived "missing links" to back
it up, insisting that evolution is one of the basic facts of modem science.
4. Biology's Big Bang. The fossil record
confirms that the fully developed ancestors for every species now alive
suddenly appeared during biology's "Big Bang" during the Cambrian
era, over 500 million years ago—still another nail in the coffin for
evolutionists, who believe that such changes could only have taken place by
very small, accidental changes over millions of years
The
universe has been structured according to a very specific design by an entity
whose intelligence is far beyond human comprehension—and because of the
existence of this grand design, there must be a grand designer.
Rubik's
Cube is a small plastic cube with rotating sides made up of many
brightly-coloured squares. Out of millions of possible combinations, there's
only one combination of all squares that provides the correct solution, the
perfect design. The universe is God's Cosmic Cube. Out of an infinite number of
possible combinations of elements, conditions and other variables that make up
this universe, they are all combined in exactly one way—and one way only—to
support the existence of life.
The
poet Edwin Arlington Robinson said, "We're all in a spiritual sandbox,
trying to spell the name of God with the wrong blocks." For the first time
in history the tools of our own exponentially growing technology are generating
scientifically confirmable evidence of God's existence—a stronger and stronger
light that's giving us the first real glimpse into what his worlds are really
like...
Unfortunately, most of us choose to ignore this evidence.
